Crlp/3771/2019 Of M/S. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
21 Dec 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlp/3771/2019 Of M/S. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
21 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crlp/3771/2019 Of M/S. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVIBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINPETITION NO: 3771 OF 2019
Between:
1. M/s. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. LTD, Having its office at sth Floor,H.No.1-10-63 and 64, Prajay Corporate House, Chikoti Gardens, Begumpet,l-tVdelaEq- [5000'16 ][Represented ][by ][its ][Director Sri ][D. ][Vijaysen Redity, ][S/o.]Late DSP Reddy.H.No.1-10-63 and 64, Prajay Corporate House, Chikoti Gardens, Begumpet,l-tVdelaEq- [5000'16 ][Represented ][by ][its ][Director Sri ][D. ][Vijaysen Redity, ][S/o.]Late DSP Reddy.
2. D. Vijaysen Reddy, Slo. Late DSP Reddy, Age Major, Occ Director (resignedon 20-03-2013), M/s. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. R/o. H. No. 1-1-380/11, AahokNagar, Hyderabad.on 20-03-2013), M/s. Prajay Holdings Pvt. Ltd. R/o. H. No. 1-1-380/11, AahokNagar, Hyderabad.
...PETtTtONEFyACCUSED(S)
AND
Qy. [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(TDS), Circle ][- ][16(2),2nd ][Floor, ] [Btock, ][l.T.]Towers, A. C. Guards, Hyderabad Represented by the Special Public Prosecutor,lncome Tax, High Court, State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to pass an order quashing C.C. No. 36 of 2018 on the file of SpecialJudge for Economic Offenses, Hyderabad.
l.A NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to pass an order staying all further proceedings in C.C. No. 36 of2018 on the file of Special Judge for Economic Offenses, Hyderabad, includingpersonal appearance of the Petitioners.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Divya Dafla,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Special Public prosecutor, lncome Tax onbehalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE K.SURENDERCRIMINAL PETITION No.3771 OF 2019
ORDERl
1. karned counsel for the petitioners submits that the causein the cr iminal petition no longer survives for adjudication and\has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said sul-rrnission, this Criminal petition isdismisse,l as infructuous.
Mi;cellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. N.CHANDRA'SEKHAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,1The Special Judge for [Economic Offences ][at ][Hyderabad]1The Special Judge for [Economic Offences ][at ][Hyderabad]
1The Special Judge 2One C() to Ms C() to Ms to Ms Ms [[Divya Datla, ][Advocate ]][[Advocate ]] 2One C() to Ms C() to Ms to Ms Ms [[Divya Datla, ][Advocate ]][[Advocate ]]
2One C() to Ms C() to Ms to Ms Ms [[Divya Datla, ][Advocate ]][[Advocate ]] 3Two Ctls to the Special [Public Prosecutor, lncome Tax, High Court, State of]3Two Ctls to the Special [Public Prosecutor, lncome Tax, High Court, State of]
Telang rna, at [Hyderabad ][OUTI4Two CI) CopiesNS(xp-NS(xp-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2'111212023
ORDERCRLP.Ncr.3771 of 2019
Dismissing the Griminal Petitionas infruc;tuous
,\-
/,.\ii 21tiB2[?ti,* L'i: L ir,iT Lrit![*]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.