Crl.p/3925/2016 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/3925/2016 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
17 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/3925/2016 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the,petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021.
BBRRORE,
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHBKAR|
CRIMINAL PERTITION NO.3925 OF 201
BETWEEN
SRI JITENDRA VIRWANI»/O MOHAN DAS VIRWANIAGED ABOUT 5O YEARSNO.332, EMBASSY WOODS.6A, CUNNINGHAM ROADVASANTHANAGAR,BANGALORE —- 560 OO] ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE)
AND
THR INCOME TAX DBPARTMEBENBY [TS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX.CIRCLE 1(2)(1), HMT BHAVAN,BELLARY ROAD
BANGALORE —- 560 OO] ... RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION4382 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TOQUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING|BEFORE THE SPECIAL COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES,|BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.91/2015 AGAINST THIS PETITIONER.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR HBARINGTHIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
sri S.Mahesh, learned counsel for the petitioner is present physically before the Court and has filed a memoseeking withdrawal of the petition. |
In this memo it is stated that the petitioner had filed
the above petition seeking quashing of proceedingsagainst him in C.C.No.91/2015 and so also connectedmatters which is pending before the Special Court forEconomic Offences, Bangalore. In the memo permissionis sought for to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty toapproach this Court if necessary in future. |
The memo is placed on record. Consequently, the,petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
LDKB
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.