In Crlp/3968/2009 Of I.seshagiri Rao v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 13, 2010KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU KL CRIMINAL PETITION No.3950 OF 2009 August 13, 2010
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3968 OF 2009
Between:
Seshagiri Rao
… PETITIONER
And
1. Income Tax Officer
2. The State of A.P.
… RESPONDENTS
This Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3968 OF 2009
ORDER:
1. The petitioner’s counsel is absent today also inspite of thematter being listed under the caption of “for dismissal”. There isno representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested topursue the matter.
2. Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed.
______________________________
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J
August 13, 2010KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
KL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3950 OF 2009
August 13, 2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue