Crl.p/408/2018 Of Sri. Ramesh Parashampuria v. Income Tax Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018.BEFORE. THE HON’‘BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 408/2018 BETWEEN SRI. RAMESH PARASHAMPURIA|S/O BABULAL PARASHAMPURIA,AGED 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.16/110,PARASHAMURIA COMPLEX, OFF DOUBLE ROAD, BELLARY-583101 .. PETITIONER. (BY SRI. ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADV.) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT|BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF.INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (3),C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROALD,BENGALURU-560 OO1. ... RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO|QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS TAKING COGNIZANCE OF|THE OFFENCES P/U/S 276C(1) OF THE INCOME TAX.ACT, REGISTERED IN C.C.NO.330/2016 BEFORE THE|SPECIAL COURT (ECONOMIC OFFENCES) BENGALURU. THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION ALONG|WITH IA.NO.1/2018 THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE|FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. As the discharge application filed by tne petitioner.being rejected by the trial Court is not challenged by.way of appropriate petition before the competent court, the criminal petition directly before this court is not|maintainable, unless it is snown to the court as to wny.the petitioner has bye-passed the reguiar process and.chalienged the said order in this petition, witnout.specifically mentioning the reason. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is.permitted to witndraw the_ petition witn liberty to.challenge the said order before the appropriate Forum. | Office is nereby directed to return all the papers.filed along with the petition to the learned counsel! forthe petitioner, forthwith. In view of disposal! of this case, the application-IANo.1/2018filedforstay, doesnotSurvivefor.consideration. Accordingly, the said application stands.disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE KGRX