Crl.p/4570/2016 Of Sri. Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4570/2016 Of Sri. Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
17 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Crl.p/4570/2016 Of Sri. Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4570 OF 2016
BETWEEN
SRI JITENDRA VIRWANI S/O MOHAN DAS VIRWANI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.332, EMBASSY WOODS 6A, CUNNINGHAM ROAD VASANTHANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 001 (PRESENTLY CORRECT ADDRESS) ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ITS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 1(2)(1), HMT BHAVAN BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE SPECIAL COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.59/2016 AGAINST THIS PETITIONER.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Sri S.Mahesh, learned counsel for the petitioner is present physically before the Court and has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
In this memo it is stated that the petitioner had filed the above petition seeking quashing of proceedings against him in C.C.No.59/2016 pending before the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore. In the memo permission is also sought for to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to approach this Court if necessary in future.
The memo is placed on record. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
DKB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.