Case LawHigh Court › Crl.p/4616/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathapp...

Crl.p/4616/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department

High Court 21 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4616/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
21 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Crl.p/4616/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. ykl od/-|JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU| DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE| THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4616 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SRI NARAYANAN SATHAPPAN,9/O NARAYAN SATHAPPA CHETTIAR,AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,BOLLUR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR — 571 234. ...PETTTIONER (BY SRI B A BELLIAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX (INV),NO.21/16, 3 FLOOR,ANYAKAR BHAVAN,RESIDENCY ROAD,NAZARBAD, MYSORE - 570 010. . RESPONDENT) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER)SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QOUASH THEPROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN C.C.NO.230/2018 (PCRNO.85/2018) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 276 C(1) OF|THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE|OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS|THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a INeCTdated21.10.2019seekingpermissionTO withdraw the petition. Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. ykl od/-|JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan