Crl.p/4617/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
22 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4617/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
22 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/4617/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 22[ND|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEKORE,
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
Crl.P. No.4617/2018
BETWEEN:
ori Narayanan Sathappans/o Narayan Sathappa ChettiarAged about ol years, BollurVillage, Kushalnagar-571234-.
Village, Kushalnagar-571234-.... Petitioner(By Sri B A Belliappa, Advocate)AND:The Income Tax Department|By Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Inv) No.21/16.[rd]Floor, Anyakar BhavanResidency Road, NazarbadMysore — 970 O10.... Respondent
(By Sri B A Belliappa, Advocate)
AND:
This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.PCpraying to quash the proceedings initiated in CC|No.232/2018 (PCR No.83/2018) for the offences P/U/S|276 (C) (1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 pending on the file|of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Kushalnagar.
This petition is coming on for orders this day, theCourt made the following:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memodated 22.10.2019 seeking leave of this Court to|withdraw the petition.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly,petitionstandsdismissedas—
withdrawn.
Bkm
sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue