Crl.p/4619/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4619/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/4619/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Sathappan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4619 OF 2018
BETWEEN
SRI NARAYANAN SATHAPPAN S/O NARAYAN SATHAPPA CHETTIAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, BOLLUR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR-571234
(BY : B A BELLIAPPA, ADV.)
AND
...PETITIONER
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INV) NO.21/16, 3RD FLOOR, ANYAKAR BHAVAN, RESIDENCY ROAD, NAZARBAD, MYSORE-570010
RESPONDENT
CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN C.C.NO.237/2018 (P.C.R.NO.78/2018) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 276(C)(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KUSHALNAGAR.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Two weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismiss without further reference to the Bench.
SD/- JUDGE COPY
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.