Crl.p/4621/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4621/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
11 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/4621/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATHKD THIS THE 1[‘T]DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
BEFORE|
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4621 OF 2018
Between:
sri Narayanan Viswanathan,»©/o Narayan Sathappa Chettiar,Aged about 405 years,Bollur Village,Kushalnagar-9571234....Petit1ioner
(By Sri.B.A.Belliappa, Advocate)|
And:
The Income Tax Department,By Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,(Inv) No.21/16, 3[rd]Floor,Anyakar Bhavan, Residency Road,Nazarbad,Mysore-5/0010.... Respondent
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 oftCr.P.C. praying to quash the proceedings initiated in)C.C.No.233/2018 (P.C.No.82/2018) for the offence.p/u/s.276C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pending on)the file of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Kushalnagar.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders, thisday, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the|criminal petition.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Mds/-
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.