Crl.p/4622/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4622/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/4622/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF OCTOBER , 2019 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI CRIMINAL PETITION NO 4622 OF 2018
BETWEEN
SRI NARAYANAN VISWANATHAN S/O NARAYAN SATHAPPA CHETTIAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BOLLUR VILLAGE KUSHALNAGAR-571 234
...Petitioner
(By Sri.: B A BELLIAPPA)
AND
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INV) NO.21/16, 3RD FLOOR ANYAKAR BHAVAN, RESIDENCY ROAD NAZARBAD, MYSORE-570 010
…Respondent
CRL.P FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE CORUT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN C.C.NO.234/2018 (PCR NO.81/2018) FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 276 C(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue