Crl.p/4623/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/4623/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
11 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/4623/2018 Of Sri Narayanan Viswanathan v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATHKD THIS THE 1[‘T]DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
BEFORE|
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4623 OF 2018
Between:
ori. Narayanan Viswanathan»©/o Narayan Sathappa ChettiarAged about 405 yearsBollur Village,Kushalnagar-9571234.
...Petitioner
(By Sri. B.A. Belliappa, Advocate)
And:
The Income Tax Department|By Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax(Inv) No.21/16, 3[rd]FIoOor|Anyakar Bhavan, Residency RoadNazarbad, Mysore-5/70010.
...Respondent
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482.Cr.P.C. praying to quash the proceedings initiated in)C.C.No.239/2018 (PCR No.80/2018) for the offence.punishable under Section 276 C(1) of the Income Tax)Act, 1961, pending on the file of the Civil Judge and)JMFC, Kushalnagar.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders, thisday, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the|criminal petition.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Mds/-
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue