Crl.p/8942/2017 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/8942/2017 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
17 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Crl.p/8942/2017 Of Sri Jitendra Virwani v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the,petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021.
BBRRORE,
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHBKAR|
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8942 OF 2017
BETWEEN
SRI JITENDRA VIRWANI»/O MOHAN DAS VIRWANIAGED ABOUT 51 YEARSNO.332, EMBASSY WOODS.6A, CUNNINGHAM ROADVASANTHANAGAR,BANGALORE —- 560 OO]
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE)
AND
THR INCOME TAX DBPARTMEBENREP. BY DBPUTY DIRECTOROF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION)|UNIT-1(2), C.R.BUILDING (ANNEXE),OQUEEN’S ROADBANGALORE —- 560 OO]REPRBESEBENTBD BY SRI P.SENTHIL —. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO|QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING|BEKERFORBE THR HONBLE SPECIAL COURT FOR BCONOOFFENCES, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.120/2016 AGAINST THE|PRTITIONEBR.
THIS|CRIMINALPETITIONCOMING|ON|KORADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
ori S.Mahesh, learned counsel for the petitioner is|present physically before the Court and has filed a memoseeking withdrawal of the petition. |
In this memo it is stated that the petitioner had filedthe above petition seeking quashing of proceedingsagainst him in C.C.No.120/2016 pending before theSpecial Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore. In thememo permission is also sought for to withdraw thepetition, reserving liberty to approach this Court ifnecessary in future.
The memo is placed on record. Consequently, the,petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DKB.
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue