Crlrc/1008/2011 Of I. Seshagiri Rao v. Income Tax Officr, And Another
High Court
07 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlrc/1008/2011 Of I. Seshagiri Rao v. Income Tax Officr, And Another
Date of order
07 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crlrc/1008/2011 Of I. Seshagiri Rao v. Income Tax Officr, And Another, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1008 of 2011
O R D E R:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the Order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2256 of 2008 in C.C. No.74 of 2009 dated 06.04.2011 on the file of learned Special Judge for Economic Offences at Hyderabad, which was filed by the petitioner under Section 245 of the Criminal Code of Procedure, wherein the petition was dismissed.
02. No representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Sri B.Narasimha Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 as well as Sri S.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/respondent No.2 are present.
03. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submitted that main C.C. No.74 of 2009 itself was disposed of.
04. Since, main case was disposed of, this revision case become infructuous.
05. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order to as costs.
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________
DR. D.NAGARJUN, J
Date: 07-Nov-2022 TMK
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1008 of 2011
Date: 07-Nov-2022
TMK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue