Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p
High Court
11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE K.SURENDER]
CRIMIN ALEVISION CASE [NO: 2435 OF ][2010]
CriminalRevisionCasefiledunderSection3gT(1)and401ofCr.PCaqainst the Judgment [za.or".)0r6iio"-in ][cr[rv.p ][ru ][o. ][3267 or ][zoos ][in ][c.c.No.61];ru'00-r, ;;fi;"iii" [o? ][ih" ][corrt ][of ][the ][Special ][Judge ][for Economic ][offences ][cum]Vrrr Aoir. Nletropolitan [Sessions ][Judge, ][Hyderabad']
Between:
The Assistant Commissioner [Of ][lncome ][Tax, ][Central ][Circle' ][Aayakar ][Bhavan']
Near Kimbata [Tank, Ralahmundry, E.G'Dist.]
..Petitioner/ComPlainant
AND
1Kotla Venkata [Ram Kumar And The ][State of ] [P, ][S/o.Venkata Ranga ][Rao']i;;i;;;;F;.n.r.ro.6-t2-te, [Main ][Road, Narsapur' ][w ][G Dist]i;;i;;;;F;.n.r.ro.6-t2-te, [Main ][Road, Narsapur' ][w ][G Dist]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Crl.R.C No.2435 OF 2010
ORDER:
1. Learnt:d counsel appearing for Income TaxDepartment u,ould submit that appeal preferred againstthe order of Income Tax Appeiiate Tribunal (ITAI) havebeen dismissed by this Court insofar as the petitioner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase doe s I rot survive for adjudication and has becomeinfructu ou s.
2. Recording the said submission the Criminal FtevisionCase is disrnissed as infructuous.
3. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, sha1 l standclosed
//TRUE
',fJJtTi,"S"aiS'SHu,-"/
SECTION
I I Add I [Me ][tro ][po ][rita ][n]
To,1 rhe [s ][peci ][a ] l'd [s:, ]l: : :""^"ff :';mr/r [:,PI,]?:: Sessions [Ju tse. ][Hvderaoii.i*[oriir[ ]loeucito [[:lri ][VithaY K]][[VithaY K]]
loeuci? one CC to [[:lri ][VithaY K]][[VithaY K]]6 EiiI [," ][s,i ][oipy:yil$|?} ]st"t",,r [reransana ][at]ti}fi"S:",1%y,:l 4- Two [CCs to ][the Publlc ][F]
HYderabad 5. Two [Co:ies]Svs,'gli
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 110912024
/.'/r ':.\, .--It,1i rliltI-i:-.-. - :. ''ORDER
CRLRC.No.2435 of 2010
DISMISSING THE CRLRC
ol\p\*\
l
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.