Case LawHigh Court › Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commiss...

Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p

High Court 11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Crlrc/2435/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar And The Staet Of A.p, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE K.SURENDER] CRIMIN ALEVISION CASE [NO: 2435 OF ][2010] CriminalRevisionCasefiledunderSection3gT(1)and401ofCr.PCaqainst the Judgment [za.or".)0r6iio"-in ][cr[rv.p ][ru ][o. ][3267 or ][zoos ][in ][c.c.No.61];ru'00-r, ;;fi;"iii" [o? ][ih" ][corrt ][of ][the ][Special ][Judge ][for Economic ][offences ][cum]Vrrr Aoir. Nletropolitan [Sessions ][Judge, ][Hyderabad'] Between: The Assistant Commissioner [Of ][lncome ][Tax, ][Central ][Circle' ][Aayakar ][Bhavan'] Near Kimbata [Tank, Ralahmundry, E.G'Dist.] ..Petitioner/ComPlainant AND 1Kotla Venkata [Ram Kumar And The ][State of ] [P, ][S/o.Venkata Ranga ][Rao']i;;i;;;;F;.n.r.ro.6-t2-te, [Main ][Road, Narsapur' ][w ][G Dist]i;;i;;;;F;.n.r.ro.6-t2-te, [Main ][Road, Narsapur' ][w ][G Dist] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER Crl.R.C No.2435 OF 2010 ORDER: 1. Learnt:d counsel appearing for Income TaxDepartment u,ould submit that appeal preferred againstthe order of Income Tax Appeiiate Tribunal (ITAI) havebeen dismissed by this Court insofar as the petitioner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase doe s I rot survive for adjudication and has becomeinfructu ou s. 2. Recording the said submission the Criminal FtevisionCase is disrnissed as infructuous. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, sha1 l standclosed //TRUE ',fJJtTi,"S"aiS'SHu,-"/ SECTION I I Add I [Me ][tro ][po ][rita ][n] To,1 rhe [s ][peci ][a ] l'd [s:, ]l: : :""^"ff :';mr/r [:,PI,]?:: Sessions [Ju tse. ][Hvderaoii.i*[oriir[ ]loeucito [[:lri ][VithaY K]][[VithaY K]] loeuci? one CC to [[:lri ][VithaY K]][[VithaY K]]6 EiiI [," ][s,i ][oipy:yil$|?} ]st"t",,r [reransana ][at]ti}fi"S:",1%y,:l 4- Two [CCs to ][the Publlc ][F] HYderabad 5. Two [Co:ies]Svs,'gli HIGH COURT DATED:1 110912024 /.'/r ':.\, .--It,1i rliltI-i:-.-. - :. ''ORDER CRLRC.No.2435 of 2010 DISMISSING THE CRLRC ol\p\*\ l
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan