Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar
High Court
11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2438 OF 2010
Between:
The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Central Circle, Aayakar Bhavan,Near Kambala Tank, Rajahmundry, E,G.Dist.
...Petitioner / Complainant
AND
1 . Kotla Venkata Ramakrishna Rao, S/o Venkata Ranga Rao, age 4'l years,Occ. Contractor R/o H.No.6-12-18, Main Road, Narsapur, W.G.Dist.Occ. Contractor R/o H.No.6-12-18, Main Road, Narsapur, W.G.Dist.
...Respondent / accused
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, HighCourt of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad-Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad-
...Respondent
Revision filed under Sections 397 (1) & 401 of CrPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal RevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to present this Crl.R.C., aggrieved by theOrder in Crl.M.P.No. 3260 of 2009 in C.C.No.54 of 2009, dated 28.01.2010 in theCourt of the Spl. Judge for Economic Offences cum Vlll Addl. MetropolitanSessions Judge, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI Vijhay K Punna
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : CH. Pushyam Kiran
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Public Prosecutor
The Court made the following Order:-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Crl.R.C No.2438 OF 2010
ORDER:
1 . Learned counsel appearing for Income TaxDepartment u.ould submit that appeal preferred againstthe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) havebeen dismissed by this Court insofar as the petitioner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase does not survive for adj udication and has becomeinfructuous.
2. Recording the said submission the Criminal RevisionCase is dismissed as infructuous.
3. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shal1 stand
closed
Sd/- B. SATYAVATHIDEPUTY FEGISTRAR /\.--- t.\SECTION
//TRUE
To,
1The Special [Judge for Economic Offences ][cum ][Vlll ][Additional Metropolitan]s.isiJns [j ][uose lHYd ][erabad]s.isiJns [j ][uose lHYd ][erabad]
2Two CCs [to ][the ][Public Prosecutor' ][High ][Court ][for ][the State ][of ][Telangana']Hyderabad IOUT]Hyderabad IOUT]
One [to ] [Viihay K Punna' Advocate ][ ]3,
4. One [to SRI ] [Pushyam Kiran' Advocate ][
5. Two [CoPies]
!C/gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110912024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2438 of 2010
eOF r4,esot!F&\\)clH
DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS
illry
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.