Case LawHigh Court › Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commiss...

Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar

High Court 11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Crlrc/2438/2010 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kotla Venkata Ram Kumar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2438 OF 2010 Between: The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax,, Central Circle, Aayakar Bhavan,Near Kambala Tank, Rajahmundry, E,G.Dist. ...Petitioner / Complainant AND 1 . Kotla Venkata Ramakrishna Rao, S/o Venkata Ranga Rao, age 4'l years,Occ. Contractor R/o H.No.6-12-18, Main Road, Narsapur, W.G.Dist.Occ. Contractor R/o H.No.6-12-18, Main Road, Narsapur, W.G.Dist. ...Respondent / accused 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, HighCourt of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad-Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad- ...Respondent Revision filed under Sections 397 (1) & 401 of CrPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal RevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to present this Crl.R.C., aggrieved by theOrder in Crl.M.P.No. 3260 of 2009 in C.C.No.54 of 2009, dated 28.01.2010 in theCourt of the Spl. Judge for Economic Offences cum Vlll Addl. MetropolitanSessions Judge, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI Vijhay K Punna Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : CH. Pushyam Kiran Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Public Prosecutor The Court made the following Order:- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER Crl.R.C No.2438 OF 2010 ORDER: 1 . Learned counsel appearing for Income TaxDepartment u.ould submit that appeal preferred againstthe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) havebeen dismissed by this Court insofar as the petitioner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase does not survive for adj udication and has becomeinfructuous. 2. Recording the said submission the Criminal RevisionCase is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shal1 stand closed Sd/- B. SATYAVATHIDEPUTY FEGISTRAR /\.--- t.\SECTION //TRUE To, 1The Special [Judge for Economic Offences ][cum ][Vlll ][Additional Metropolitan]s.isiJns [j ][uose lHYd ][erabad]s.isiJns [j ][uose lHYd ][erabad] 2Two CCs [to ][the ][Public Prosecutor' ][High ][Court ][for ][the State ][of ][Telangana']Hyderabad IOUT]Hyderabad IOUT] One [to ] [Viihay K Punna' Advocate ][ ]3, 4. One [to SRI ] [Pushyam Kiran' Advocate ][ 5. Two [CoPies] !C/gh HIGH COURT DATED:1110912024 ORDER CRLRC.No.2438 of 2010 eOF r4,esot!F&\\)clH DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS illry
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan