In Crl.rp v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the memo, the revision petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU.
DATEBD THIS THE 3 DAY OF JANUARY 2017
BEFORE|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.|
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.139/2017
BETWEEN4
orl H Nagaraja»/o HanumanthappaAged 43 years|R/at No.6 and 7“sri Ganesh Krupa’New Bank Colony.KonanakunteBengaluru-560 OO2. (By Sri Aravind V Chavan, Adv.)
.. PETITIONER
AND7
Income Tax DepartmentBy Deputy Commissioner —Of Income TaxCentral Circle-2(2)C.R. Building|Queens Road|Bengaluru-560 OO1.
_ RBSPONDEBENT
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed undersection 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C praying todischarge the petitioner by setting aside the order dated16.03.2016 passed by the P.O., Spl. Court (EconomicOffences), Bangalore in C.C.No.18/2015 dismissing theapplication filed under Section 245 of the CR.P.C.produced as Annexure-P and allow the Crl.R.P.
This Criminal Revision Petition coming on forOrders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the revision petitioner hasfiled a memo seeking withdrawal of the revision petition.
The memo is placed on record.
2. In view of the memo, the revision petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
Cs/-
Sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue