Case Law › High Court › Crl.rp/400/2020 Of The Income Tax Depart...

Crl.rp/400/2020 Of The Income Tax Department v. Sri Sanjay Raj

High Court 15 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

15 Jul 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Crl.rp/400/2020 Of The Income Tax Department v. Sri Sanjay Raj, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Digitally signedbyMARKONAHALLIRAMU PRIYALocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15 DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 400 OF 2020BETWEEN: THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ITS INCOME TAX OFFICE (TDS) TDS-WARD-18(2), H.M.T.BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. SANJAY RAJ DIRECTOR, M/S GOLDEN GATE PROPERTIES LTD., NO.820, GOLDEN HOUSE, 80 FEET ROAD, 8 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SAHANA Y.M., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF DISCHARGE OF RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED NO.3 VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 02.08.2019 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCE AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. 2. Revision petition came to be filed on 14.01.2020. Till today, office objections are not complied. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.