Crl.rp/532/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S Kingfisher Airlines Limited
High Court
12 Jun 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.rp/532/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S Kingfisher Airlines Limited
Date of order
12 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.rp/532/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S Kingfisher Airlines Limited, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.532 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
1. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE 2(1), H.M.T. BHAVAN, NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, NO.59,
BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE 560032 BANGALORE 560032
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED NO.35/2, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BAGNALORE -560052. NO.35/2, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BAGNALORE -560052.
2. SRI A K RAVINDRANATH NEDUNGADI DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR,
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT AGAINST RESPONDENT IN F.R.NO.4/2020 BY THE SPECIAL COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES AT BANGALORE DATED 10.01.2020 AND ETC.,
THIS CRL.RP, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo filed reporting the death of second respondent on 29.01.2022.
Sri E.I. Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that in respect of the first respondent another criminal case is filed and the same is pending. Therefore, the present revision petition stands dismissed as it would not survive and dismissal of the present revision petition shall not affect another pending case against the first respondent.
Sd/- JUDGE
MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.