In Crm-M v. Director Of Income Tax (Inv.),Ambala, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Sh. Dhan Singh Sharma
CRM-M-14347 of 2014Date of decision: 26.4.2014
---Petitioner
versus
Director of Income Tax (Inv.),Ambala
Respondent
Coram:Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
222
Present:Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocatefor the petitioner
222
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see thjudgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
REKHA MITTAL, J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition may be
dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
April 28, 2014
PARAMJIT
(REKHA MITTAL )JIUDG
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.