Case LawHigh Court › Crm-M/33931/2018 Of M/S Shivalik Infrast...

Crm-M/33931/2018 Of M/S Shivalik Infrastructure And Developers Pvt Ltd And Ors v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Crm-M/33931/2018 Of M/S Shivalik Infrastructure And Developers Pvt Ltd And Ors v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Crm-M/33931/2018 Of M/S Shivalik Infrastructure And Developers Pvt Ltd And Ors v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter under Section 2, Section 276C of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHAN DIGAR CRM-M-33931-2018 (O&M)Date of Decision!0.09.2019 M/s Shivalik Infrastructure and Developers Pvt Ltd and others _ Petitioners )!*&+& Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6(1), Mohali ...Respondent(s)CRM-M-38977-2018 (O&M) M/s Shiwalik Site Planners Pvt. Ltd. and others _ Petitioners )!*&+& Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6(1), Mohali ...Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPA Present:Ms.Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. M.S.Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms.Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counsel forIncome lax DepartmentIncome lax Department ANIL KSHETARPAL,a By this order, two petitions bearing CRM-M-33931-2018 andCRM-M-38977-2019 shall stand disposed of. Petitioners have approached this Court by way of thesepetitions for quashing of criminal complaints filed in the Court of ChiefJudicial Magistrate, Chandigarh under Section 276C (2) read with Section2/77 and read with Section 278(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on th ground that they are ready to pay the detaulted amount. Pursuant to the notice issued, reply has been filed in which it ispointed out that certain amount has been paid, however, still there isoutstanding amount. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners areready to make an application before the competent authority i.e. Principal,Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Chandigarh, North-West Region forcompounding of the offences. She further submits that competent authoritymay be directed to take a call thereon within one month, Learned counsel for the respondent does not have anyobjection. In view of the above, both these petitions are disposed of withadirection to the competent authority to take a call on the application if anyfiled for compounding of the offences. The learned trial court is requestedto adjourn the case for a period of one month, 10.09.2019(ANIL KSHETARPAL)45&JUDGEWhether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether Reportable:Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan