Crompton Greaves Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Circle 1(1), Mumbai & Others
High Court
28 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Crompton Greaves Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Circle 1(1), Mumbai & Others
Date of order
28 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Crompton Greaves Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Circle 1(1), Mumbai & Others, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.243 OF 2011
Crompton Greaves Limited..Petitioner.
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS), Circle 1(1), Mumbai & Others..Respondents.
Mr.J.D. Mistri i/by T. Pooram & Co. for the petitioner.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondents.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. DATE : 28[th] March, 2011.
1.Challenging three orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under Sections 195, 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, all dated 22-02-2000, the petitioner had filed three appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the pendency of the appeals, demands raised under Sections 195, 201(1) and 201(1A) were stayed. Even the extended period granted by the Tribunal has expired. The apprehension of the petitioner is that in view of the provisions contained in the proviso to Section 254(2A), the respondents may enforce the demand during the pendency of the appeals pending before the Tribunal.
2.We are informed that the aforesaid three appeals are fixed for
hearing on 25th April 2011. In this view of the matter, the respondents are restrained from enforcing the demand pursuant to the three orders, all dated 22-02-2000, which are subject matter of appeals before the Tribunal till the disposal of appeals and for a period four weeks thereafter.
3.The writ petition is accordingly disposed off. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.