C/Sca/11166/2020 Order v. Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2)(1) Surat
High Court
11 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
C/Sca/11166/2020 Order v. Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2)(1) Surat
Date of order
11 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In C/Sca/11166/2020 Order v. Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2)(1) Surat, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11166 of 2020
==========================================================ASHOKKUMAR FOJAJI MALI VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1) SURAT
==========================================================
Appearance:MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATHandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
Date : 11/09/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.We have heard Mr. Hardik Vora, the learned counselappearing for the writ applicant.
2.We take notice of the fact that the writ applicant haspreferred an application dated 12.3.2020 addressed to thePrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Surat, seekingstay of the demand under Section 220(6) of the Act. Mr.Vora would submit that although his application is of themonth of March, yet till this date, the PrincipalCommissioner has not taken any decision. We dispose ofthis application with the direction to the PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax-2, Surat to take up the
application filed by the writ applicant dated 12-3-2020 andpass appropriate order in accordance with the law within aperiod of 15 days from the date of receipt of the writ of thisorder.
3.With the above, this writ application standsdisposed of.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
RADHAN/DRASHTI K. SHUKLA
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.