C/Sca/18770/2018 Order v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2
High Court
10 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
C/Sca/18770/2018 Order v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2
Date of order
10 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In C/Sca/18770/2018 Order v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18770 of 2018
==========================================================PARAM JEWELS PVT. LTDVersus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1)(2)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUDHIR M MEHTA(2058) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MS SHAILEE S MEHTA(5873) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANIandHONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 10/12/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1.Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
2.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
Z.G. SHAIKH
(A. P. THAKER, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue