C/Sca/8249/2018 Order v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ==========================================================
High Court
20 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
C/Sca/8249/2018 Order v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ==========================================================
Date of order
20 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In C/Sca/8249/2018 Order v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ==========================================================, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: KARIA Date : 20/08/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The petitioner is an assessee and he is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order passed by the Assessing Officer as confirmed by CIT(Appeals).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8249 of 2018
==========================================================ARVINDKUMAR K PATEL
VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX==========================================================
Appearance:HLP ASSOCIATES LLP(9263) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 20/08/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
The petitioner is an assessee and he is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order passed by the Assessing Officer as confirmed by CIT(Appeals). In such appeal, he prayed for stay of further recovery. Tribunal by impugned order dated 4.5.2018 refused to grant such stay. Before the Tribunal, the assessee's case was that 50% of the tax demand has already been paid. Tribunal instead of granting stay decided to hear the appeal early which was fixed on 6.8.2018. Against this order, the petitioner has approached this Court.
Without disturbing the Tribunal's decision to hear the appeal expeditiously, we provide that upon the departmental authority verifying that the petitioner has deposited at-least 50% of the disputed tax amount, there shall be stay till the Tribunal decides the petitioner's appeal. If the Commissioner of Income-
tax is of the opinion that the petitioner has not deposited such amount of 50%, he shall send a communication to this effect latest by 10.9.2018 indicating his computation of outstanding tax and the deposit made by the petitioner so far and the short fall, upon which, the petitioner shall make good the deficit latest by 15.10.2018, failing which, stay pending appeal shall stand automatically vacated.
Petition is disposed of.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
Raghu
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.