C/Taxap/48/2019 Order v. Maheshbhai Tulshibhai Patel
High Court
14 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
C/Taxap/48/2019 Order v. Maheshbhai Tulshibhai Patel
Date of order
14 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In C/Taxap/48/2019 Order v. Maheshbhai Tulshibhai Patel, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as notpressed in light of the Circular dated 08.08.2019.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 48 of 2019
==========================================================INCOME TAX OFFICER VersusMAHESHBHAI TULSHIBHAI PATEL
==========================================================Appearance:
MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH(3238) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANIand
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Date : 14/10/2019 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1. Heard Mrs.Kalpana K. Raval, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant and Ms.Vaibhavi K. Parikh, learned advocate for the respondent.
2. Mrs.Kalpana K. Raval, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, has stated that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/-. Under the circumstances, in thelight of the Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which provides that no appeal wherein the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/-
C/TAXAP/48/2019 ORDER
shall be filed before the High Court and which has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeal.
3. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as notpressed in light of the Circular dated 08.08.2019. However, in case there is any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if, for any reason, the Circular is not applicable, it would be open for the appellant to seek revival of the appeal.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
RAVI P. PATEL
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.