Case LawHigh Court › C.vijayabaskar v. The Deputy Commissione...

C.vijayabaskar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2(1)

High Court 20 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
C.vijayabaskar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2(1)
Date of order
20 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In C.vijayabaskar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 2(1), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.12.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.34970 of 2019and WMP.No.35759 of 2019 C.Vijayabaskar Vs. .. Petitioner The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 2(1), No.46, M G Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. TN .. Respondent Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ ofMandamus, to direct the Respondent to permit the Petitioners'through his Authorized Representative to exercise the right ofcross examination of the Respondent's Seven Witnesses asspecified in Schedule-A and to afford proper and adequate finalopportunity to the Petitioner before making any Assessment Orderin the pending Proceedings u/s 153 A in accordance withprinciples of natural justice.SCHEDULE-AiShri J.Sekar Reddy-SRS MiningiiShri Srinivasulu-SRS MiningiiiShri Madhav RaoivShri Mohammed AbdullahvThe Engineer Incharge in M/s.Gridline Surveysand Geospatial Pvt. LtdviShri R.Gopalakrishnan-DVO-IviiShri R.Venkatesan For Petitioner : Mr.Nithyaesh NatrajFor Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel O R D E R Written instructions dated 19.12.2019 are circulated todayby the revenue counsel, in regard to the opportunity for crossexamination sought of the following seven persons: i.J.Sekar Reddy - SRS Mining, ii.Srinivasulu - SRS Mining, iii. Madhav Rao, iv.Mohammed Abdullah, v.The Engineer in charge in M/s.Gridline Surveys andGeospatial Pvt Ltd, vi.R.Gopalakrishnan - DVO I, vii. R.Venkatesan. 2.As far as the following four persons: i.e., i.Srinivasulu - SRS Mining, ii.Mohammed Abdullah, iii. The Engineer in charge in M/s.Gridline Surveys andGeospatial Pvt Ltd (drone survey), iv.R.Gopalakrishnan - DVO I (drone survey report), are concerned, admittedly opportunity for cross examination hasbeen extended. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus does notpursue the cause of action as far as these individuals areconcerned. 3.As regards (i) Sekar Reddy (ii) Madhav Rao and (iii)R.Venkatesan, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax hascategorically stated that no examination has taken place nor anystatements recorded, either in the search or in the assessmentproceedings and hence there is no scope for cross-examination.This is recorded. 4.Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent alsostates on instructions, that any documents yet to be supplied asper pending requests of the petitioner, will be furnished to thepetitioner immediately. This is also recorded. 5.This writ petition is closed as above. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 2(1), No.46, M G Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. TN +1 CC to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate sr 106471. +2 Ccs to Mr. Nithyaesh Vaibhav, Advocate sr 106172. W.P.No.34970 of 2019and WMP.No.35759 of 2019 VBA(CO)SP(04/02/2020)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan