Cvnr, J & Ckr, J Itta v. Acit (Civil Appeal
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Cvnr, J & Ckr, J Itta v. Acit (Civil Appeal
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cvnr, J & Ckr, J Itta v. Acit (Civil Appeal, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, the Appeal is dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) Dt: 7[th] November, 2017 Msb/lur _____________________ (Challa Kodanda Ram, J)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddyand
The Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram
ITTA No.615 of 2017
Date: 07.11.2017
Between: The Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Hyderabad. … Appellant andVijay Infotech Ventures 402 Ground floor, Surya Towers, Secunderabad …Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Ms.M.Kiranmayee, Sr.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Dept., The Court made the following:
Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
The issue that fell for consideration before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) was whether the income derived from the building let out for Software Technology Park can be regarded as income under the head ‘Profit and Gains of Business’ or ‘Income from House Property’. The Tribunal has rendered a finding of fact that the main object of the assessee was to lease out the property; that the assessee has created the partnership firm with the object of leasing out the property to make profit; and that therefore, the income has to be treated as the one derived from business. In support of its conclusions, the Tribunal has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in M/s.Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd., (Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2004, dated 09.04.2015, and Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Civil Appeal No.6437 of 2016, dt.11.08.2016).
As the findings of the Tribunal, questioned in this Appeal, pertain to a pure question of fact and the conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal is well supported by the judgments
of the Supreme Court referred to above, we do not find any substantial question of law for adjudication in this Appeal.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed.
______________________
(C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
Dt: 7[th] November, 2017 Msb/lur
_____________________
(Challa Kodanda Ram, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.