Cw/13968/2017 Of Satyanarayan v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Ors

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13968 / 2017lR;ukjk;.k 'kekZ iq= Jhjke’kj.k 'kekZ mez djhc 55 lky fuoklh edku ua0 122] th.kekrk dk [kqjk] lwjtiksy cktkj] jkexat t;iqjA ---------izkFkhZ&;kph cuke 1-Jheku vk;dj vihy vf/kdj.k eqEcbZ tfj, jftLVªkj2-Jheku fMIVh jftLVªkj vk;dj vihy vf/kdj.k] 11oh eafty yksd uk;dHkou] [kku cktkj] ubZ fnYyh3-Jheku lgk;d jftLVªkj vk;dj vihy vf/kdj.k t;iqjA --------vizkFkhZx.k&izfroknhx.k _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : None present. For Respondent(s) : _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 26/08/2017 The petitioner claims to have been working on the post ofWaterman on daily wages in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunaland claims that he was wrongfully removed from service andanother person has been appointed in his place. Apparently, the dispute can be examined before the Tribunal,under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence alternate effectiveremedy is available to the petitioner. If the petitioner raises such adispute, it is expected that the Labour Court shall address to thestatement of claim and decide the dispute within 9 monthspreferably thereafter. The writ petition is dismissed with aforesaid observations. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)J.