Cwjc v. Mr. D.v. Pathy, Learned Counsel For The
High Court
09 Mar 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc v. Mr. D.v. Pathy, Learned Counsel For The
Date of order
09 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cwjc v. Mr. D.v. Pathy, Learned Counsel For The, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.3948 of 2010
1. NIDAN, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY OF REGISTRATION ACT, 1860, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SUDAMA BHAWAN, BORING ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. SRI KRISHNA PURI, PATNA 800001 THROUGH ITS MEMBER SRI RANJAN KUMAR S/O LATE KAMLA PRASAD SINGH R/O SUDAMA BHAWAN, BORING ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.- SRIKRISHNA PURI, DISTT.- PATNA 800001
Versus
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, BEER CHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA - 800001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT LOK NAYAK JAI PRAKASH BUILDING, DAK BUNGALOW ROAD, PATNA-800001
-----------
2 09-03-2010
Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this application to prefer appeal under section 260 A of the
Income-Tax Act, 1961.
Writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn.
Certified copy of the order passed by the Tribunal be returned to him on submission of photocopy thereof.
(Dipak Misra, C.J.)
Abhay Kumar
( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.