Cwjc/11404/2022 Of Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna
High Court
14 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/11404/2022 Of Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna
Date of order
14 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cwjc/11404/2022 Of Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11404 of 2022
======================================================
Gyan Infrabuild Private Limited a company incorporated under theCompanies Act, 1956 having its Head Office at, Awaleshpur, Kandwa,Varanasi, 221006, Uttar Pradesh through its Director Hulas Pandey (Male)(aged about 46 Years) son of Sri Kameshwar Pandey, resident of Ward No. 28,Pandey Place, (Commar Banglow), Coffey House, Pali Road, Dehri, Rohtas,Dehri-on-Sone, Bihar - 821307.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna.
2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle- 3, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate Mr. Amrendra Narayan Rai, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate Mr. Alok Kr. Shahi, Advocate Ms. Swarna Rai, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASADORAL ORDERORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
514-03-2023Learned counsel for the petitioner, after somearguments, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
This application is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn.
It will be open to the petitioner to avail statutoryremedy, if available under law.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, ACJ)
Sumit/Shashank-
U
( Madhuresh Prasad, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue