Cwjc/11487/2021 Of M/S Deepshree Properties Pvt. Ltd v. The Union Of India State Of Bihar
High Court
25 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/11487/2021 Of M/S Deepshree Properties Pvt. Ltd v. The Union Of India State Of Bihar
Date of order
25 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cwjc/11487/2021 Of M/S Deepshree Properties Pvt. Ltd v. The Union Of India State Of Bihar, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11487 of 2021
======================================================
M/s Deepshree Properties Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at 101Godawari Palace Saguna more Danapur, Patna through its Director, Smt.Lalita Yadav, aged about 60 years (Female), W/o Sri Sunil Kumar, Flat no.501, Parwati Palace, Sidharth Nagar, Jagdeo Path, Ps.- Rupaspur, Distt.- Patna
Versus
... ... Petitioner/s
1.The Union of India State of Bihar through the Principal Chief Commissionerof Income Tax, Bihar, Patnaof Income Tax, Bihar, Patna
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax/Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Central Circle-2, PatnaIncome Tax, Central Circle-2, Patna
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:Dr. K. N. Singh, ASG
Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC, CGST & CX
For the State
:Ms. Archana Shahi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
425-08-2021
The petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s
Ashwini/Sujit
U
After the matter was heard for some time, ShriSandeep Kumar, learned senior counsel, under instructions fromthe petitioner, states that the petitioner would prefer an appealassailing the impugned order dated 19.04.2021, passed byrespondent No. 2.
Ms. Archana Shahi, learned counsel for therespondent states that if the petitioner chooses to exercise thatoption within a period of two months from today, the issue oflimitation shall not come in the way and the appeal shall beheard on merit.
Statement accepted and taken on record.
Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall standdisposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.