Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/14269/2022 Of Smt. Pratima Singh v....

Cwjc/14269/2022 Of Smt. Pratima Singh v. Versus

High Court 06 Apr 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/14269/2022 Of Smt. Pratima Singh v. Versus
Date of order
06 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cwjc/14269/2022 Of Smt. Pratima Singh v. Versus, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition stands dismissed with the aforesaid observation.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14269 of 2022 ====================================================== Smt. Pratima Singh W/o Aditya Kumar Singh, Resident of Shermari Bazar,P.S.- Pirpainti, Bhagalpur- 813209 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 306-04-2023 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The writ petition has been filed against the order dated 30.03.2022 (Annexure-4) passed by the Assessing Officer underthe Income Tax Act. The contention raised by the petitioner before thisCourt is that an opportunity of hearing had not been granted tothe petitioner. In fact, it is admitted that a notice was issued andthe hearing date was fixed, on which date the petitioner soughtan adjournment. On the next hearing date, petitioner failed toappear and the Assessing Officer completed the assessment. shivank/- U We cannot find any violation of principles of naturaljustice in the given facts and circumstances. However, we leaveopen the remedy to the petitioner to approach the appellateauthority under the Income Tax Act. The writ petition stands dismissed with the aforesaid observation. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Harish Kumar, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan