Cwjc/16300/2021 Of Basak Stores v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna
High Court
17 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/16300/2021 Of Basak Stores v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna
Date of order
17 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cwjc/16300/2021 Of Basak Stores v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16300 of 2021
======================================================
Basak Stores, a partnership firm through its partner having its office atChoudhary Market Ashok Raj Path, Patna through its partner Utpal Basak(Male) (aged about 52 years) son of Late Nitya Gopal Basak, resident of 3,10/B, Opp Banita Vihar School, Sampatchak, P.S. Rajendra Nagar, Patna,Bihar-800016.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna, having its office atCentral Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
2.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna.
3.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna.
717-07-2023
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. D.V.Pathy, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr.Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the
request of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
sharun/-
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue