Cwjc/1811/2010 Of Bihar State Madrasa Educationa v. The Union Of India
High Court
03 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/1811/2010 Of Bihar State Madrasa Educationa v. The Union Of India
Date of order
03 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cwjc/1811/2010 Of Bihar State Madrasa Educationa v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1811 of 2010
*****
1. BIHAR STATE MADRASA EDUCATIONAL BOARD, BEING A BOARD CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BIHAR STATE MADRASA EDUCATION BOARD ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5 VIDYAPATI MARG, P.O. PATNA G.P.O., P.S. KOTWALI IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SRI MD. MUSTAFA HUSSAIN MANSURI, S/O LATE AMANULLAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O HAROON NAGAR, SECTOR I, P.O. PHULWARISHARIF, P.S. PHULWARISHARIF, IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA
….….Petitioner
Versus
1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, PATNA
3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, PATNA
….
….Respondents
-----------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Jain, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad Singh, Advocate ----------
2. 3.2.2010. Mr. Vikash Jain, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition to file the appeal challenging the order of assessment. If the appeal is filed within a period of four
weeks, as agreed to by Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad Singh,
Standing Counsel for the Revenue, he will not object to the condonation of delay.
In view of the aforesaid, we direct, if an appeal
Pawan/-
is preferred within the stipulated period the same shall be taken up and decided on its own merits and shall not be thrown over the board on the ground of limitation.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn.
Needless to emphasise, it is open to the petitioner to raise all possible points before the appellate authority as permissible in law.
(Dipak Misra, CJ)
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.