Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/20656/2010 Of Mohan Kumar Khandelwa...

Cwjc/20656/2010 Of Mohan Kumar Khandelwal Andanr v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii, Patna

High Court 19 Aug 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/20656/2010 Of Mohan Kumar Khandelwal Andanr v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii, Patna
Date of order
19 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cwjc/20656/2010 Of Mohan Kumar Khandelwal Andanr v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii, Patna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: As such, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20656 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Mohan Kumar Khandelwal, son of Sri Durga Prasad Khandelwal, agedabout 47 Years, resident of Flat No.- 201, Block 'C', Kaushalya Estate, BanderBagicha, G.P.O.-Patna, P.S.- Kotwali in the town and the Distt.- Patna2. Smt. Sangeeta Khandelwal @ Sangita Khandelwal, wife of Sri MohanKumar Khandelwal, aged about 45 years, resident of Flat No.- 201, Block 'C',Kaushalya Estate, Bander Bagicha, G.P.O.-Patna, P.S.- Kotwali in the townand the Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.Commissioner of Income Tax -II, Patna. 2.Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna 3.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2, Ranchi 4.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2, Ranchi 5.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5, Patna 6.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5, Patna 7.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6, Patna 8.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6, Patna 9.The Director General of Income Tax Investigation, Patna 10.Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry ofFinance, Govt. of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi-110001Finance, Govt. of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi-110001 ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMARORAL ORDERORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1519-08-2020Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s): “For issuance of an appropriate writ quashing theshow cause notices dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure-2series); and the order dated 19.11.2010 (Annexure-4series) passed pursuant thereto u/s 127 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”) whereby andwhereunder the Respondent No. 1 has arbitrarily and sujit/- U illegally directed that the powers of the AssessingOfficer as mentioned at column 4 thereof in respectof the Petitioners’ cases shall be exercised by theAssessing Officer as mentioned at column 5 thereof;as also notices bearing Nos. 602 to 608 all dated03.12.2010 (Annexure-5 series) issued u/s 153C bythe Respondent No. 7 to the Petitioner No. 1 for theAssessment Years 2009-2010 to 2003-04respectively as also the assessment order all dated30.12.2010 u/s 153(c)/143(3) Annexure 10 series andfor such consequential reliefs as the Petitioners maybe entitled to.” Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as it has become infructuous. As such, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan