Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/21003/2011 Of The Best Towers Pvt.l...

Cwjc/21003/2011 Of The Best Towers Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2

High Court 02 Jan 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/21003/2011 Of The Best Towers Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2
Date of order
02 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cwjc/21003/2011 Of The Best Towers Pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21003 of 2011====================================================== The Best Towers Pvt.Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act having its office at 2[nd] Floor, Faiz-E-Ali Building, Kabadi Gali, Exhibition Road, Patna through its Managing Director, Parvez Ahmad, son of Late Dr. Tahir Hussain, resident of 801A, While House, Budha Marg, PS Kotwali, P.O. GPO, District Patna .... .... Petitioner Versus 1.Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, having its office at Central Revenue Building, Beerchand Patel Marg, Patna Building, Beerchand Patel Marg, Patna 2.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -2 having its office at Jai Prakash Narain Bhawan, Dak Bungalow Road, Patna Prakash Narain Bhawan, Dak Bungalow Road, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra Junior Standing Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGHORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 02-01-2014 Learned advocate Mr. D V Pathy submits that pending this petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. The petition has thus become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. Leave is granted. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) mrl
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan