Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/3835/2015 Of M/S Anmol Agrovet v. T...

Cwjc/3835/2015 Of M/S Anmol Agrovet v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur

High Court 24 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/3835/2015 Of M/S Anmol Agrovet v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
24 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Cwjc/3835/2015 Of M/S Anmol Agrovet v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3835 of 2015 ====================================================== M/s Anmol Agrovet a proprietorship firm having it's place of business at SIDCO Industrial Area, IGC Phase- 1, Samba, Jammu through it's proprietor Mohan Kumar Agrawal son of Late Chedi Prasad resident of 99 Pocket-1, 2nd Floor, Jasola, New Delhi- 110076. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur. 2. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range-1, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Bela Kothi, Bela, Muzaffarpur. 4. The J and K Bank Ltd. Samba, Jammu. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Advocate Mrs. Archana Prasad, Sr. S.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTAand HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 3 24-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Sr. S.C. for the Income Tax Department. In view of the statement made in the counter affidavit, the writ application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan