Cwjc/3953/1998 Of M/S Navrang Vinimay P Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar, Patna
High Court
08 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/3953/1998 Of M/S Navrang Vinimay P Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar, Patna
Date of order
08 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cwjc/3953/1998 Of M/S Navrang Vinimay P Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar, Patna, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
08-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3953 of 1998
M/S NAVRANG VINIMAY (P) LTD., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at A/64 LIG, Kankarbagh Colony, Patna through its Director Basant Kumar Agarwal son of shri V K Agarwal, resident of 1494, Sector 28, Faridabad, PS Faridabad, Dist. Faridabad (U.P.)……Petitioner
Versus
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Bihar, Patna
2. The Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Central Revenue Building, Patna
3. The Additional Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Alankar Palace, 3[rd] floor, Boring Road, Patna
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range (I), Alankar Palace, 3[rd] floor, Boring Road, Patna
5. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Investigation, Alankar Palace, 3[rd] floor, Boring Road, Patna
6. The Bank of Madura, Cannaught Palace, New Delhi
……Respondents
-----------
8/11/2010
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Department of Income Tax. The writ petition has been preferred to set
aside the order passed by the Department, whereby the petitioner has been restrained from operating their account with the Bank of Madura, Cannaught Palace Branch, New Delhi, and to return the amount withdrawn by the Department from the said bank account.
2. It appears to us on a perusal of the materials on record that the writ petition has become infructuous. It is accordingly
dismissed as having become infructuous.
( S K Katriar )
( Birendra Prasad Verma )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.