Cwjc/4895/2017 Of Khrist Raja Educational Association v. Commissioner Of Income Tax , (Appeal), Muzaffarpur
High Court
05 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/4895/2017 Of Khrist Raja Educational Association v. Commissioner Of Income Tax , (Appeal), Muzaffarpur
Date of order
05 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cwjc/4895/2017 Of Khrist Raja Educational Association v. Commissioner Of Income Tax , (Appeal), Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 22,45,810/- recovered from the petitioner shall be refunded back to the petitioner within 15 days and in the said facts the appeal is allowed in favour of the appellant and the exemption is granted by appellate authority the amount of Rs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4895 of 2017
===========================================================
Khrist Raja Educational Association, a society registered under the Societies Act having its Office at K R High School Campus Bettiah, District- West Champaran through its Vice President Donald Miranda Son of late Felix Miranda, Resident of K R High School Campus, P.O. Belbagh, P.S. Mufassil Thana Bettiah District- West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1.Commissioner of Income Tax , (Appeal), Muzaffarpur, having its office at Bela Industrial Area, Muzaffarpur. Industrial Area, Muzaffarpur.
2.Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions, Muzaffarpur.
3.Income Tax Office, Ward- Exemptions, Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V. Pathy, Advocate Ms. Manju Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr.S.C. Ms. Shilpi Keshri, Jr.S.C.
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASADORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)Date: 05-07-2018
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and without
going into the various controversies involved in the matter considering the fact that the amount of Rs. 22,45,810/- has already been recovered from the petitioner after the impugned action was taken and Challan issued we deem appropriate now to direct the appellate authority to decide the appeal of the petitioner in accordance with law.
Accordingly, we direct that on appearing before the
appellate authority and filing a certified copy of this order on 23[rd]July, 2018 the appellate authority shall proceed to decide the appeal in accordance with law on merit within a period of 15 days thereof considering the question of exemption to be granted to the petitioner under Section 11 in the light of the registration available to the petitioner under Section 12 AA and decide the appeal within the aforesaid period. In case appellate authority decides the appeal in favour of the appellant and passes an appropriate order granting the exemption the amount of Rs. 22,45,810/- recovered from the petitioner shall be refunded back to the petitioner within 15 days and in the said facts the appeal is allowed in favour of the appellant and the exemption is granted by appellate authority the amount of Rs. 22,45,810/- recovered from the appellant shall be refunded to him within 15 days and the excuse of the revenue filing further appeal or its substitution against the order shall not come in the way in refund of the aforesaid amount.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
Dilip/- Ved/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date06.07.2018 Transmission NA Date
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.