Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India
High Court
06 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India
Date of order
06 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6021 of 2011
====================================================
M/s Ajay Kumar, a partnership firm having office at Aranya Vihar, Boring Road, Patna now at 30, Nitibag, P.O. B.V. College, Distt. Patna 800 014 through its managing Partner Smt. Vidya Singh resident of 30 Nitibag P.O. B.V. College P.S. Shashtri Nagar, Distt. Patna.
….….Petitioner
Versus
1.The Union of India through the Commissioner, Income Tax Central Revenue Building, Patna. Revenue Building, Patna.
2.The Central Board of Direct Taxes, Income Tax through the Chairman, New Delhi. New Delhi.
3.The Commissioner, Income Tax (Appeals) II, Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna. Patna.
4.The Additional Commissioner, Income Tax Range 4, Patna Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna. J.P. Bhawan, Patna.
5.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (1), Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna.
….….Respondents
====================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate with
Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate
====================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2. 6.4.2011.
Learned Advocate Mr. Nand Kishore Singh
appears for the petitioner. He states that since filing of
this writ petition the stay application made before the
assessing authority has been rejected. He states that the petitioner shall avail of the alternative remedy. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave is granted.
The petition stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
The petitioner will be at liberty to avail of
the alternative remedy.
Pawan/-
(R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.