Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The...

Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India

High Court 06 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India
Date of order
06 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cwjc/6021/2011 Of M/S Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.6021 of 2011 ==================================================== M/s Ajay Kumar, a partnership firm having office at Aranya Vihar, Boring Road, Patna now at 30, Nitibag, P.O. B.V. College, Distt. Patna 800 014 through its managing Partner Smt. Vidya Singh resident of 30 Nitibag P.O. B.V. College P.S. Shashtri Nagar, Distt. Patna. ….….Petitioner Versus 1.The Union of India through the Commissioner, Income Tax Central Revenue Building, Patna. Revenue Building, Patna. 2.The Central Board of Direct Taxes, Income Tax through the Chairman, New Delhi. New Delhi. 3.The Commissioner, Income Tax (Appeals) II, Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna. Patna. 4.The Additional Commissioner, Income Tax Range 4, Patna Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna. J.P. Bhawan, Patna. 5.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (1), Loknayak J.P. Bhawan, Patna. ….….Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate with Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 6.4.2011. Learned Advocate Mr. Nand Kishore Singh appears for the petitioner. He states that since filing of this writ petition the stay application made before the assessing authority has been rejected. He states that the petitioner shall avail of the alternative remedy. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The petitioner will be at liberty to avail of the alternative remedy. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan