Cwjc/6973/2016 Of Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ( T D S )
High Court
06 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/6973/2016 Of Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ( T D S )
Date of order
06 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cwjc/6973/2016 Of Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax ( T D S ), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6973 of 2016
======================================================
1. Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra, son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra, resident of Village- Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar, P.S. Parihar, District- Sitamarhi. Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra, son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra, resident of Village- Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar, P.S. Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax ( T D S ) having its office at Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna. Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II having its office at Central Revenue Building Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna. Revenue Building Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
3. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna.
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6421 of 2016
======================================================
1. Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra Son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra resident of village - Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar, P.S. Parihar, District - Sitamarhi Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra Son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra resident of village - Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar, P.S. Parihar, District - Sitamarhi
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax ( T D S ) having its Office at Central Revenue Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna Revenue Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna
2. Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeals ) - II, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna
3. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6462 of 2016
======================================================
1. Nai Rajdhani Path Pramandal, Road Construction Department Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra, Son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra, resident of Village- Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar P.S. Parihar, District- Sitamarhi. Government of Bihar, Patna through its Executive Engineer, Chandra Mohan Kumar Mishra, Son of Shri Mahendra Kishore Mishra, resident of Village- Sutihar, P.O. Sutihar P.S. Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax (T D S) having its office at Central
Revenue Building Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, having its Office at Central Revenue Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna. Revenue Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
3. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Patna.
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2
06-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has sought for quashing of the order dated 9th of February, 2016 passed by the respondent Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna. Admittedly the said order is an appealable order before the Income Tax Tribunal and we are informed that the appeal has in fact been preferred by the petitioner.
For the Petitioners : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2
06-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has sought for quashing of the order dated 9th of February, 2016 passed by the respondent Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Patna. Admittedly the said order is an appealable order before the Income Tax Tribunal and we are informed that the appeal has in fact been preferred by the petitioner.
The grievance of the petitioner is that a direction be issued to the Commissioner of Income Tax to decide the appeal in the light of the judgment of this Court passed in C.W.J.C.No. 16015 of 2015 decided on 15th of February, 2016. We find that no such direction can be issued as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has passed an order prior to the order of this Court.
It is open to the petitioner to raise such argument as is available to it in accordance with law before the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals) or in further appeal before the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal. In case the petitioner wants out of turn hearing of appeal, it is open to the petitioner to make a mention before an appropriate Bench.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, these writ applications are disposed of.
(Hemant Gupta, ACJ)
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
A.I./-
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.