Case LawHigh Court › Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v...

Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna

High Court 29 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna
Date of order
29 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7152 of 2016 ====================================================== Smt. Vandana Agrawal, wife of Sri Pramod Kumar @ Pramod KumarAgrawal, Proprietor Aditya Infomedia having its office at Durga Vihar, ShopNo.4, S.P. Verma Road, P.O. G.P.O., Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna,resident of Nai Sarak Chowk Patna City-3, P.S. Chowk, P.O. Jhauganj, PatnaCity, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Commissioner of Income Tax- II, Patna having its office at Central RevenueBuilding, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna. 2. Tax Recovery Officer-II, Patna having its office at Lok Nayak JaiprakashBhawan, 3rd Floor, New Dak Bungalow Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/sBhawan, 3rd Floor, New Dak Bungalow Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: NoneFor the Respondent/s: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Senior Standing Counsel Ms. Shilpi Keshri, Jr. S.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 629-01-2018 None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel whorepresented the petitioner on 06.11.2017 pleads no instructions.The matter was taken up on 20[th] November, 2017 when noneappeared. Thereafter, on 29.11.2017 also none appeared. Itseems that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. Thepetition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan