Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna
High Court
29 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna
Date of order
29 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Cwjc/7152/2016 Of Smt. Vandana Agrawal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Patna, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7152 of 2016
======================================================
Smt. Vandana Agrawal, wife of Sri Pramod Kumar @ Pramod KumarAgrawal, Proprietor Aditya Infomedia having its office at Durga Vihar, ShopNo.4, S.P. Verma Road, P.O. G.P.O., Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna,resident of Nai Sarak Chowk Patna City-3, P.S. Chowk, P.O. Jhauganj, PatnaCity, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax- II, Patna having its office at Central RevenueBuilding, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
2. Tax Recovery Officer-II, Patna having its office at Lok Nayak JaiprakashBhawan, 3rd Floor, New Dak Bungalow Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/sBhawan, 3rd Floor, New Dak Bungalow Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: NoneFor the Respondent/s: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Senior Standing Counsel Ms. Shilpi Keshri, Jr. S.C.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
629-01-2018 None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel whorepresented the petitioner on 06.11.2017 pleads no instructions.The matter was taken up on 20[th] November, 2017 when noneappeared. Thereafter, on 29.11.2017 also none appeared. Itseems that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. Thepetition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
Sunil/-
U
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.