Cwp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2,Ludhiana
High Court
07 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2,Ludhiana
Date of order
07 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cwp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2,Ludhiana, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CWP No.25856 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.25856 of 2017 Date of decision:07.12.2017
Smt. Ritu Garg
... Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2,Ludhiana... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:-Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocatefor the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1.In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of theConstitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in thenature of certiorari for setting aside the impugned show cause notice dated30.03.2017 (Annexure P-4) for reopening the assessment and subsequent
proceedings and impugned order dated 25.09.2017 (Annexure P-7) passedby the respondent, whereby the objections of the petitioner to reopening ofthe case of the assessee, have been dismissed.
2.After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitionersubmitted that she may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petitionwith liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas at the appropriate stage, inaccordance with law.
CWP No.25856 of 2017
3.Dismissed as withdrawn.
4.However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse tothe remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
December 07, 2017savitaWhether Speaking/ReasonedWhether Reportable
(AMIT RAWAL)JUDGEYes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.