Case Law › High Court › Cwp/11282/2016 Of Meenu Satija v. Princi...

Cwp/11282/2016 Of Meenu Satija v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon And Anr

High Court 31 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

31 May 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Cwp/11282/2016 Of Meenu Satija v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Gurgaon And Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11282 of 2016 (O&M)Date of decision: 31.5.2016 Meenu Satya occeee Petitioner /".&+& Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and another......... Respondents CORAM: - Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal.Hon'ble Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu. Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate withMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may bepermitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternativeremedy of appeal against the impugned order, Annexure P-5. He furthersubmitted that as after filing the present petition, the period of limitation forfiling the statutory appeal has expired, he may be given some time to file theappeal, Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If theStatutory appeal is filed within a period of one week from today, the sameShall not be dismissed only on account of delay and shall be considered bythe Appellate Authority on merits. (Rajesh Bindal)Judge (Harinder Singh Sidhu)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.