Cwp/14441/2021 Of Delta Energy Systems (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)
High Court
02 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/14441/2021 Of Delta Energy Systems (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)
Date of order
02 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cwp/14441/2021 Of Delta Energy Systems (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition stands disposed of, Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc, Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
118IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14441 of 2021 (O&M)Date of decision : 02.08.2021
Delta Energy Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Petitioner
VeTSUS
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 1 (1), Gurgaon...... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK AJAY TEWARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
...
Present : Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Advocate for the petitioner....
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Qral)
By this petition the petitioner is claiming refund which was due to
him for the Assessment Year 2006-2007.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Tajender Joshi, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf ofthe respondent and has very fairly stated that the claim of the petitioner hasto be taken up and decided one way or the other and he undertakes that theprayer made in Annexure (P-8) would be decided within one month fromtoday positively and if the refund is to be paid, the same shall also be paid tothe petitioner within that period of one month.
Petition stands disposed of,
Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc,
Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
( VIKAS BAHL)JUDGE|
02. O§ JO2pooja sharma-l
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.