Case LawHigh Court › Cwp/24639/2015 Of Jinender Kumar Jain v....

Cwp/24639/2015 Of Jinender Kumar Jain v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula And Ors

High Court 19 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/24639/2015 Of Jinender Kumar Jain v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula And Ors
Date of order
19 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Cwp/24639/2015 Of Jinender Kumar Jain v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula And Ors, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3,The petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OR PUNJAB AND HARYANA|§AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 7695 of 2017 in ~~ CWP No. 24639 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.01.2018 Jinender Kumar Jain —____- Petitioner -(.*/* Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICHHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN, JUDGEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN, JUDGE Present:Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate|for the petitioner.for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the respondents, S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE The application for early hearing of the petition is allowed. 2 The main petition is taken on Board. 3,The petition is allowed to be withdrawn. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE 19.01.2018Tee N (AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable: Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan