Case LawHigh Court › Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income...

Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors

High Court 14 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors
Date of order
14 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARR CWP No. 2505-2015Date of decision: 14.01.2016 Sheetal Goyal Vs, Income Tax Office and others ... Petitioner a. Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG Present:Mr. B.M.Monga, Advocate andMr. Ronit Kaura, Advocatefor the petitioner.Mr. Ronit Kaura, Advocatefor the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the respondents.for the respondents. 4444 AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,J (ORAL) Tne challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 oftne Constitution of India, is for setting aside the impugned noticedated 31.03.2014 (Annexure P2) under Section 148 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 and impugned order dated 28.01.2015 (Annexure P9)passed by respondent No.1, rejecting the objections raised by thepetitioner. 2.Aiter arguing for sometime, learned counsel for tnepetitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writpetition witn liberty to the petitioner to challenge the initiation ofreassessment proceedings, before tne Appellate Authority, in case anyadverse order is passed by the Assessing Authority in the reassessment proceedings. ‘3Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to thepetitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to herIn accordance witn law] (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE 14.01.2016 smriti (RAJ RAHUL GARG )|JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan