Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors
High Court
14 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors
Date of order
14 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cwp/2505/2015 Of Sheetal Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward-4 And Ors, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARR
CWP No. 2505-2015Date of decision: 14.01.2016
Sheetal Goyal
Vs,
Income Tax Office and others
... Petitioner
a. Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
Present:Mr. B.M.Monga, Advocate andMr. Ronit Kaura, Advocatefor the petitioner.Mr. Ronit Kaura, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor the respondents.for the respondents.
4444
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,J (ORAL)
Tne challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 oftne Constitution of India, is for setting aside the impugned noticedated 31.03.2014 (Annexure P2) under Section 148 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 and impugned order dated 28.01.2015 (Annexure P9)passed by respondent No.1, rejecting the objections raised by thepetitioner.
2.Aiter arguing for sometime, learned counsel for tnepetitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writpetition witn liberty to the petitioner to challenge the initiation ofreassessment proceedings, before tne Appellate Authority, in case anyadverse order is passed by the Assessing Authority in the
reassessment proceedings.
‘3Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to thepetitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to herIn accordance witn law]
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
14.01.2016
smriti
(RAJ RAHUL GARG )|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.