Case LawHigh Court › Cwp/28369/2017 Of Vardhman Textiles Ltd...

Cwp/28369/2017 Of Vardhman Textiles Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana

High Court 07 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Cwp/28369/2017 Of Vardhman Textiles Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana
Date of order
07 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cwp/28369/2017 Of Vardhman Textiles Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CW P-28369-2017Decided on: 07.03.2019 Vardhman Textiles Ltd ... Petitioner %- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana .-- Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, Present:Mr. M. S. Kanda, Advocatefor the petitioner-assessee.for the petitioner-assessee. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent-revenue. >K K AJAY KUMAR MITTAL_J (ORAL) The petitioner by way of amended writ petition underArticles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, had challengedthe notice dated 29.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) issued under Section 147 ofthe Income-tax Act (in short ‘the Act’) and order dated 29.09.2017(Annexure P-7), whereby the official filed objections initiated underSection 148 of the Act, were rejected. 2 Learned counsel for the revenue has produced thecommunication received from the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-1, Ludhiana dated 01.03.2019 intimating him that the assessmentproceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act on 29.03.2017 for theassessment year 2010-11 have been dropped vide order dated28.02.2019. Copy of the office order as well as communication havebeen placed on record. Office to tag the same at appropriate place. 3Accordingly, prayer was made that the present writ petitionis rendered infructuous and be disposed of as such. 4Ordered accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 07.03.2019Dinesh (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGEWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan