Case Law › High Court › Cwp/3410/2004 Of Kartar Kaur v. The Comm...

Cwp/3410/2004 Of Kartar Kaur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I And Others

High Court 19 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

19 Dec 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Cwp/3410/2004 Of Kartar Kaur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I And Others, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Civil Writ Petition No.3410 of 2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.3410 of 2004 Date of Decision: 19.12.2014 Smt. Kartar Kaur ..Petitioner versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-I and others ..Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.WALIA Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents. RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner is not present. The situationwas no different on 17.12.2014. It would also be appropriate tomention that four other similar writ petitions bearing nos.2846, 4221,4292 and 4348 of 2004 were dismissed for non-prosecution on5.11.2014, but no one has come forward to seek restoration. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE JUDGE ( B.S.WALIA ) JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.