In Cwp/3565/2014 Of R.k.mahajan v. Cpio-Cum-Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
J2IQZIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3565-2014Date of Decision : 22.03.2017
R.K. Mahajan
VEISUS|
Petitioner
CPIO-cum-Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax and others....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
Present:Ms. Sukhpreet Kaur, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocatefor the respondents.
M.M.S. BEDI, JUDGE (ORAL)
The copies supplied to the petitioner appear to fulfill theparameters of the information. It is not the case of the petitioner that herequires to produce the certified copies before any court of law. It is notnecessary to provide the certified copy. In case, the law permits thecertified copies can be provided as per the provisions of Section 79 ofthe Evidence Act.
No ground is made out for issuing any direction for
supplying any information better than the information already supplied
to the petitioner.
Dismissed.
22.03.2017Neha
(M.M.S. BEDI)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue